- From: Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:10:37 +0200
- To: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Peter, indeed, they take a practical approach, translating WCAG 2 into a manageable check list and adding some practical examples and own interpretations where appropriate. I don't think they translate each and every detail of WCAG2, but it seems to be well received. It's not an official label by the way, although many government agencies ask them to audit websites. Best regards, Bart PS: on a somewhat related note, you might be interested in the AEGIS and its OAEG group, they have compiled a list of accessibility standards and guidelines http://www.oaeg.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=506&Itemid=23 ________________________________________ From: Peter Krantz [peter.krantz@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 3:32 PM To: Hanssens Bart; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Examples of WCAG 2 implementations in national web guidelines? On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 13:57, Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be> wrote: > > Anysurfer labels are based upon WCAG / WCAG 2, but somewhat less abstract > No English version available, so take a look at the NL / FR info pages Thank you. Do I understand it correctly that Anysurfer partially implements WCAG 2 with interpretation on some of the guidelines? E.g. this guideline http://www.anysurfer.org/acties-zijn-niet-strikt-tijdsgebonden references WCAG 2.2.1 success criteria but has some other requirements/interpretations as well. Regards, Peter
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2011 19:11:12 UTC