- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:01:59 +0000
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, site-comments@w3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Ian what is the hold on an independent external audit? an audit to assess whether and to what extent W3C is meeting the goals it sets? this was apparently under-discussion at the time. regards Jonathan >> ). But >> given the W3C's key role in producing the relevant specs and >> guidelines, there's a good case for saying its own pages should be >> subject to far higher standards of quality control than any other on >> the Web. Best practices, leading by example and all that. >> >> A good way for dealing with this would be for the W3C to instigate an >> independent review, > > Hi Danny, > > I appreciate any offer of tools to help us maintain pages that > people use, and where the tool ends up lowering our costs. > > This list is one way people raise awareness about page problems, and > I read the list and fix the ones that we are maintaining and can be > fixed. > > _ Ian > >
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:01:46 UTC