- From: Priti <priti.rohra@n-syst.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:27:27 +0530
- To: "'Roger Hudson'" <rhudson@usability.com.au>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E1P6HlS-0007c6-9w@lisa.w3.org>
Hi Roger, The documents are relatively clean but not fully "Accessible". Heading structure, bulleted lists and links were fine but tables and images need to be looked at. Please find below the findings for the 3 documents tested using JAWS 9 & Adobe Reader 9: Gannet-word[1].PDF: 1. Alt text read out immediately after h1 on the page is redundant as you have mentioned order of the image is not correct but alt itself is not required in this context. 2. Australasian Gannet 3. Table on page2 lacks table headers . 4. Footer information is not read out, does not seem to be important in this document but is essential at least when it includes legal details, such as copyright etc. In my perspective user should have at least have access to that information once in the document. Swamphen-acrobat[1].PDF: 5. Alternate text is available as the first piece of information on the page, but dual instances of the same were found: "Swamphell on the grass" beginning of the page and "mc-ref" before the figure caption. 6. Footer information same as "Gannet" document. Pelican-acrob-mod[1].PDF: 7. Again dual instances of the alt is found on page 1 of the document "Australian Pelican" and "mc-ref" both before the figure caption. 8. Footer issue same as other two documents 9. Table on page 2 lacks table headers. Thanks & Regards, Priti Rohra Head Accessibility Testing Net Systems Informatics (India) Pvt. Ltd. & BarrierBreak Technologies Web: www.n-syst.com <blocked::http://www.n-syst.com/> | www.barrierbreak.com <blocked::http://www.barrierbreak.com/> Blog: www.barrierbreak.com/blog <blocked::http://www.barrierbreak.com/blog> Please don't print this email unless you really need to. This will preserve trees on our planet. _____ From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roger Hudson Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 9:09 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: how accessible are these pdfs Hi I have just recently prepared three simple test PDFs and I am interested in seeing how accessible they are for users of different assistive technologies. If you have a moment, would you mind considering this short article and the PDFs that it links to - http://www.dingoaccess.com/accessibility/are-these-pdfs-accessible/ All feedback greatly appreciated. Thanks Roger Roger Hudson Web Usability Email: <mailto:rhudson@usability.com.au> rhudson@usability.com.au Web: <http://www.usability.com.au/> www.usability.com.au Blog: www.dingoaccess.com
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 06:58:13 UTC