- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'Henri Sivonen'" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: "'HTMLWG WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, "'W3C WAI-XTECH'" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
>
> The email you cite is not an objection from the PFWG. It is an email
> by individuals. The overlap with PFWG participants is small.
>
For the record:
WAI does not have a formal 'membership', however all of the signatories
have involved themselves in various WAI activities in the past.
"WAI welcomes...
* participation from around the world
* volunteers to review, implement, and promote guidelines
* dedicated participants in working groups"
[source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ ]
As well, the fact that the signatories (volunteers all) are not all PFWG
members should in no way diminish the fact that a collection of
accessibility advocates, who have contributed to the W3C now and in the
past, collectively feel/felt that there is a real problem with process,
*AND* rather than just complain took constructive action to try and remedy
that problem.
Is there a problem with that?
JF
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 19:54:53 UTC