- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:33:30 +0100
- To: W Reagan <wreagan1@yahoo.com>
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, gv@trace.wisc.edu
On 12/08/2009 14:20, W Reagan wrote: > I have advised the Working Group my site does not contain any forms, or > scripts. > However, I a member of WAI advised me, even with links it is applicable. That makes sense. Links are "Components that have … functionality", are they not? > Therefore, my follow up question is this: > If I template my page based on ada.gov and/or disabilityinfo.gov will > the links pass Succession Criteria 3.2.4. If you do that /and/ "Components that have the same functionality within a set of Web page are identified consistently", then you will pass Success Criterion 3.2.4. If you "template your page" but "Components that have the same functionality within a set of Web page are [not] identified consistently", then you will fail. > The difference between the two sites is ada.gov has links at the top and > the bottom. > Disabilityinfo.gov has links at the left, which are also at the bottom. I don't see the significance of this difference for Success Criterion 3.2.4. Please explain your thinking. > Are these a good starting template? After a /very/ brief look at the two homepages, I'm personally more impressed by disability.gov. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 13:34:13 UTC