- From: N Maffeo <maffeonjr@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 08:05:19 UTC
That does not answer the original question. Will one of the seven techniques be sufficient? Will it require one technique from part 1 and one technique from part 2? I pasted it in my first e-mail to w3.org. --- On Sun, 8/9/09, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> Subject: Re: Bypass Blocks (2.4.1) To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 7:49 AM On 9 Aug 2009, at 08:41, N Maffeo wrote: > What do you mean "You meet the criteria by meeting the criteria"? What is sufficient enough for 2.4.1? You meet 2.4.1 if there is a mechanism to bypass blocks of content that are repeated on multiple pages. --David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 08:05:19 UTC