[Fwd: Re: Consistent ID (3.2.4)]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:  Re: Consistent ID (3.2.4)
Date:  Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:  Chris Reeve <chrisreeve15@yahoo.com>
To:  Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>



Patrick, in addtiion to 2.4.4, I also want Multiple Ways (2.4.5). Note:
Multiple Ways is already set and complied to, and (Bypass Blocks, 2.4.1).

Please let me know if my suggestion of hiding information will intefer
or cause a failure in another rule. If yes, what are my options?

--- On *Tue, 8/4/09, Patrick H. Lauke /<redux@splintered.co.uk>/* wrote:


     From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
     Subject: Re: Consistent ID (3.2.4)
     To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
     Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 1:30 AM

     Chris Reeve wrote:
      > Please take a look at
     http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/G197, example
     3. Can a contact link still pass 3.2.4, if the text link is hidden?

     Hidden how? And what would a user (sighted and/or using AT) perceive?

     P
     -- Patrick H. Lauke
     ______________________________________________________________
     re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
     [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

     www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
     http://redux.deviantart.com <http://redux.deviantart.com/> |
     http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
     ______________________________________________________________
     Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
     http://webstandards.org/
     ______________________________________________________________



-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2279 - Release Date: 08/03/09 05:57:00