- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@ncbi.ie>
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:49:40 +0000
- To: accessys@smart.net
- Cc: Maitreyee Krishnaswamy <maitreyee.krishnaswamy@gmail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi Bob, I guess this point is moot. Accessys@smart.net wrote: > to the contrary. the smaller the user set the more critical to use > very different forms for testing, and using different operating > systems is far more important than using different adaptations on a > single operating system. For the user test results to be of any use the testers should try to represent the majority of use cases for a particular user group (screen reader users, screen mag, or switch access). In truth, you just won't cover very much ground at all with such a small number of testers, so it may be best to try to produce useful results by constraining the platforms/UAs used in the test rather than trying to thinly cover too many bases. Most people are using Windows anyway, very few use the Mac OS and even less the Linux OSs. Cheers Josh ******************************************************************** NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of NCBI ********************************************************************
Received on Monday, 1 December 2008 14:50:30 UTC