- From: Joachim Andersson <joachim.andersson@etu.se>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:10:13 +0200
- To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org, "William R Williams" <wrwilliams@fs.fed.us>, "Accessys@smart.net" <accessys@smart.net>, "John Foliot" <foliot@wats.ca>, "Harry Loots" <harry.loots@ieee.org>, "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com>, "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, webaim-forum@list.webaim.org
- Message-ID: <a92e08980809050410v2c1489efjd655c685d529ee5f@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you for an interesting answer. Is there an online source for this information where I can read more about it Bill? 2008/9/5 David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net> > or ada. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William R Williams" <wrwilliams@fs.fed.us> > To: <w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org> > Cc: "Accessys@smart.net" <accessys@smart.net>; "John Foliot" > <foliot@wats.ca>; "Harry Loots" <harry.loots@ieee.org>; "James Craig" > <jcraig@apple.com>; "Joachim Andersson" <joachim.andersson@etu.se>; > "wai-ig > list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>; <w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org>; <wai-xtech@w3.org > >; > <webaim-forum@list.webaim.org> > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:09 PM > Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google > > > > The law in the USA is called Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 > U.S.C. 794d), as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (P.L. > 105-220), August 7, 1998. It's scope is limited to Federal Departments and > Agencies. There are no real enforcement mechanisms. Only an "individual > with a disability may file a complaint alleging that a Federal department > or agency fails to comply" with the law. > > The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requires agencies to acquire > accessible electronic and information unless an exception applies and is > documented. Across all agencies, an assessment in late-2007 showed that > only 3% of the solicitations that included electronic and information > technology properly included the Section 508 standards. > > Bill Williams > > > > > David Woolley > <forums@david-woo > lley.me.uk> To > Sent by: Joachim Andersson > w3c-wai-ig-reques <joachim.andersson@etu.se> > t@w3.org cc > "Accessys@smart.net" > <accessys@smart.net>, Harry Loots > 09/04/2008 02:36 <harry.loots@ieee.org>, James Craig > PM <jcraig@apple.com>, John Foliot > <foliot@wats.ca>, wai-ig list > <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, > "wai-xtech@w3.org WAI-XTECH" > <wai-xtech@w3.org>, > webaim-forum@list.webaim.org > Subject > Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google > > > > > > > > > > > > Joachim Andersson wrote: > > If someone hit me in the face I would think twice about making an effort > > to help him, wouldn't you? I'm from Sweden. The country where everyone's > > complaining, noone's doing anything about things and the complaints > > lining up. > > > > In my line of work I meet many people with disabilities of all kinds, > > who are very competent and they're doing a great job working with web > > accessibility and solutions to help others. But these people are those > > that don't march and such. They have found other, more effective ways of > > reaching their goals. > > > > I realize the importance of marching and so on, but 1975 is another time > > than 2008. In Sweden, Canada and the United States there are laws on how > > accessibility should be a part of development. In Canada and the United > > Are they enforced? In the UK such laws exist but are not enforced. > Even where companies have policies, when it actually comes to buying, > the supplier and buyer often find ways to get round them. The same goes > for electromagnetic compatibility, a subject dear to the heart of > another minority, amateur radio operators. > > > > -- > David Woolley > Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. > RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, > that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 5 September 2008 11:10:49 UTC