- From: Ryan Jean <ryanj@disnetwork.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:26:30 -0400
- To: "'David Woolley'" <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
In my case, the need for a printer friendly page is to eliminate other unimportant content I have on the page (which is inside other cells trapped inside the same table). The page itself IS web accessible. I'm just trying to get the printer friendly part web accessible. Sincerely, Ryan Jean Assistant IT Specialist The Disability Network Flint, MI -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Woolley Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 6:05 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: WCAG2 Conformance Questions Ryan Jean wrote: > > > Usually when I see printer friendly links, it results in a pop-up. If I In my experience the need for a printer friendly page indicates that the original page is not accessible, or at least, that the designer doesn't understand CSS. I would suggest that most accessible pages only need @media to print properly using the basic browser print functionality. Some specific reasons why people might want an explicit printer friendly page are: - open source browsers could be tweaked to give a printer like handling on display media, resulting in the suppression of advertising (advertising is commonly removed in the printer friendly version). In that case, there may be a static printer friendly version, but it won't be shown to search engines; - there seems to be a big psychological need amongst designers to turn their documents into mini web browsers and eliminate the standard browser controls. > were to have it link like that, the content would have to be duplicated > on a separate page, which I don't want to do. Do you know server-side > scripting that will hide the content of the other cells? And not only > that, but make them act like they aren't even there? -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 13:28:51 UTC