- From: Ryan Jean <ryanj@disnetwork.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:16:41 -0400
- To: "'Accessys@smart.net'" <accessys@smart.net>
- Cc: "'David Woolley'" <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I know this is off topic, but here is the history of GUI if anyone is interested: At the beginning of the 80s, technicians from Xerox created a computer that was based on graphics. Since their company was about photocopying, they wanted to expand on the idea and make command-line computers into graphic-based computers. They came up with a device called a mouse. When you clicked on a certain image, or "icon", it executed a command. But the Xerox heads thought the idea was ridiculous and declined it. Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple, heard about this new idea and went to learn more. He bought the idea from the Xerox techs to create the first Macintosh in 1984. During the making of the Macintosh, Bill Gates, CEO of Microsoft, found out about the "Mac-in-making". Bill convinced Steve to let him help work on it. Instead, Bill wanted to improve his DOS and make it more like Macintosh. In the end, Bill took ideas from the Macintosh, embedded them in DOS, and renamed it Windows. That's the gist of it all. Sincerely, Ryan Jean Assistant IT Specialist The Disability Network Flint, MI -----Original Message----- From: Accessys@smart.net [mailto:accessys@smart.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:04 AM To: Ryan Jean Cc: 'David Woolley'; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Commands and Accessibility ABSOLUTELY the number of visually impaired users that I have heard lament the degrading of accessibility over the years is never ending it seems. one nice thing about linux is that it still has the "command line" built in even if hidden and just opening a terminal window (or having the computer boot into terminal mode) will allow almost all features to still be used even if sometimes a little crudely. Linux is also suffering from GUI'ism. Bob On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Ryan Jean wrote: > > Is it just me or does it seem like DOS was a lot more accessible to users > than Windows? Is it a fair statement to say command-line operating systems > (DOS, Unix, and Apple) are more accessible than their graphic user interface > counterparts (Windows, Linux, and Macintosh)? > > Sincerely, > Ryan Jean > Assistant IT Specialist > The Disability Network > Flint, MI > > > - end ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ occasionally a true patriot must defend his country from its' government +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety", Benjamin Franklin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASCII Ribbon Campaign. . . . . . . . . . . . accessBob .NO HTML/PDF/RTF/MIME in e-mail. . . . . . . accessys@smartnospam.net .NO MSWord docs in e-mail . . . .. . . . . . Access Systems, engineers .NO attachments in e-mail, .*LINUX powered*. access is a civil right *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# *# THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 15:18:56 UTC