- From: Accessys@smart.net <accessys@smart.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:51:06 -0500 (EST)
- To: Matt Morgan-May <mattmay@adobe.com>
- cc: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, "M. Urban" <m.urban@trilliumjazz.com>, "Haileselassie, Antonio O. (HQ-LM020)[InDyne, Inc]" <Antonio.O.Haileselassie@nasa.gov>
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Matt Morgan-May wrote: > You've outlined a number of issues, some of which I can agree with. One of > them is a critical flaw. I don't think the site in question is exemplary of > modern accessible design practices, and for that reason I've asked that it > be updated or removed from the site. > > However, I can't help but notice that your concerns are mostly about > validation, and that your testing tool is the text browser Lynx, and not any > real-world assistive technology. There's more to it than semantics and LYNX IS REAL WORLD assistive tech, if you have a screen reader it works best in an all text setting. why do you have to force fit a solution to an artificial problem, if it cascades gracefully to plain text it will almost always work. > validation, and the templates that I've tested, with the exceptions noted > below, work fine with assistive technology. uh, how do you define assistive technology, is not EMACSPEAK running on linux a valid assistive technology???? the rest of the e-mail is tilting at artificial windmills. excuse my rant but the world is NOT exclusively windows and jaws. Bob > > On 3/24/08 11:03 AM, "David Dorward" <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > > * XHTML in a world with Internet Explorer > > [MM] Not an accessibility issue. > > > * Transitional (when the differences between Transitional and Strict > > are tiny other that the addition of things which violate WCAG) > > [MM] This also has nothing to do with accessibility. > > > * No XML prolog (required if not UTF-8) but a claim that it is > > ISO-8859-1 > > [MM] This is required for standards mode in IE 6. > > > * Navigation implemented as a select element ... and dependant on > > JavaScript > > [MM] Yes, this is an issue, and I will see that it is resolved. > > > * JavaScript commented out. This was encouraged in HTML 4.x to > > protect pre-HTML 3.2. In XML, however, it is an actual comment. This > > causes the document to depend on being served as text/html rather > > then application/xhtml+xml (which the specification says it SHOULD be > > served as). > > [MM] Not an issue since, as you mentioned, it doesn't have the XML prolog, > and is XHTML Transitional. > > > * Lack of label elements > > [MM] Yes, this is also an issue. > > > * Invalid > > [MM] Yes, there are some bullets missing alt text, and that shouldn't be, > though in reality it doesn't affect the overall accessibility. But do > superfluous attributes here and there really make a document inaccessible? > Be careful of your answer: > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdorward.me.uk%2F > > > * ASCII art used to separate list items ... no li elements in > > evidence on some lists. > > [MM] Now you're really overreaching. A pipe is not "ASCII art". As most of > us know by now, printable characters between adjacent links were specified > in WCAG 1 checkpoint 10.5. > > > * ALL CAPS used instead of CSS. IIRC, this causes some screen readers > > to spell the word out as an abbreviation. > > [MM] Yes, also an issue, but mostly an inconvenience. And in JAWS 8, at > least, it does read correctly. > > - > m > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ occasionally a true patriot must defend his country from its' government +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety", Benjamin Franklin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASCII Ribbon Campaign. . . . . . . . . . . . accessBob .NO HTML/PDF/RTF/MIME in e-mail. . . . . . . accessys@smartnospam.net .NO MSWord docs in e-mail . . . .. . . . . . Access Systems, engineers .NO attachments in e-mail, .*LINUX powered*. access is a civil right *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
Received on Monday, 24 March 2008 23:49:19 UTC