W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: XForms and Adobe Forms - WAI Version 1 AA Compliant

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:17:27 +0000
Message-ID: <47B1B887.7040205@googlemail.com>
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>, "www-forms@w3.org" <www-forms@w3.org>

Steven Pemberton wrote:
> You could design forms with XForms that were not accessible, but you 
> would have to go out of your way.

This seems a reasonable claim so far as the design of the XForms 
language goes, but given this is a citizen portal I'd have thought an 
important question what do citizens need in order to actually use XForms?

XForms is unsupported in any popular browser without either installing a 
plugin/addon or using a JS library to fake XForms behaviour:


Wouldn't dependence on either put a website in contravention of WCAG 1.0 
Checkpoint 6.3 (Priority 1) [1]?

In practical terms, it's not clear that the various XForms solutions out 
there have been tested for cross-platform accessibility, although at 
least IBM Workplace Forms Viewer claims to work with screen readers 
supporting the Microsoft Active Accessibility framework [2]. For 
example, there are JS-based solutions that claim to work in Safari but 
do they also work with the VoiceOver screen reader?

Of course, one could provide a scriptless HTML forms-based alternative, 
but then one could do this with /any/ inaccessible forms technology.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/wai-pageauth.html#tech-scripts


Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:17:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:31 UTC