- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:03:23 +0100
- To: 'WAI Interest Group' <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program wrote: [ Apple authoring guidelines for iPhone ] > <link media="only screen and (max-device-width: 480px)" > href="small-device.css" type="text/css" That tends to confirm my hypothesis that designers will only detect based on screen size, not on device class. However, Apple are responsible for tools like iWeb that create semantics free HTML (div, span, img, a and style attributes), so I don't think they are a reliable source for anyone who isn't purely interested in reproducing a visual appearence. They seem to me to target the extreme WYSIWYG end of the market Apple's marketing claim, here, will be that they have created a handheld browser that does WYSIWYG for mainstream web content and therefore, given the exclusions in the original question, that this thread is irrelevant to iPhone. Like most marketing positions, one probably needs to avoid taking it at face value. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 08:03:13 UTC