- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:38:01 -0500
- To: "WAI Interest Group" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFA0687C59.8A9E92A4-ON86257362.0058CDC5-86257362.005B6F49@us.ibm.com>
> If done the right way, Javascript can work fine with AT like screen readers . . . > Granted, this shuts out users who (through choice, or situations beyond their control) > can't/won't run Javascript, but I believe that under WCAG 2.0 that's fine > (as it's about access for users with disabilities, not "universal access"). > IMHO, of course. > Patrick Well said Patrick. Although I think "it's about " can be more than WCAG 2.0. Many of us, including you, me and others are also trying to make internet access more affordable, but WCAG 1.0 does not make the internet more affordable per se. No one is paying less to turn JavaScript off. . . And as I said before, access to JavaScript should be like getting access to the front door, or HTML, or multimedia. People with disabilities want to interact with JavaScript rich sites for the reasons everyone else does, regardless of disability - but that is a policy discussion. WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 is about a set of technical standards. The WCAG 2.0 FAQs answer the question as to when to start using WCAG 2.0 and list the benefits of starting now - see http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/wcag2faq.html#start There are many benefits to using WCAG 2.0 Working Drafts in your current and upcoming projects: WCAG 2.0 is more applicable to current technologies, future technologies, and non-W3C technologies. WCAG 2.0 supporting documents, such as Understanding WCAG 2.0, provide more information to help you understand and implement the guidelines. You can develop and submit techniques that may be added to Techniques for WCAG 2.0. You will be ahead of some others, and when WCAG 2.0 is finalized you will be able to meet it sooner. Regards, Phill Jenkins IBM Research - Human Ability & Accessibility Center http://www.ibm.com/able
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:38:21 UTC