- From: John Foliot <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:26:15 -0700
- To: "'Patrick H. Lauke'" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "'wai-ig list'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Lachlan Hunt'" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20070701#l-227 I am about this close to registering a formal complaint to the W3C regarding this entire tone and lack of respect - these are the people we are entrusting to author and design the next generation of web markup? Hey Lachlan (JERK!), regarding your question [http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20070701#l-225]: "<Lachy> why is it that when accessibility advocates can't come up with a rational argument, they always fall back to the legal stick? " Here's your rational argument: all humans are equal, and they should be treated as such. Any argument that attempts to counter that basic tenet is simply irrational, and in most countries, illegal. The day you actually understand that, instead of simply paying lip-service to it, you will no longer need to ask such stupid questions. Smell that! John Foliot (and yes... I've hovered over the "Send" button for about 10 minutes now. I stand by what I just wrote)
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 20:27:15 UTC