- From: Chris Harpin <chris@castus.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:17:16 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I wish to publicly congratulate Andy on taking his responsibility as a web developer seriously and wishing to look after the best interest of his client. Suggesting user testing with people that use AT's will help the bank to understand why some of there initial suggestions would be better being delivered using alternative methods. When a client pays for our services they are employing a specialist and it is up to us to advise them on what is the best cause of action whilst attempting to educate them as to why. The fact that they wish to include an accessibility statement shows that they are aware the topic exists, finding out which stakeholder introduced it and then explaining your concerns to that department, may help to then in turn influence others. -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Voelcker Sent: 07 June 2007 11:04 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Major UK bank wont listen Hi Andy, > i feel very uncomfortable doing this, could any body please advise > me on how i can reason with these people What is your brief? If you are there just to build the site, just do as they ask. If you are there to provide some consultancy services, then put together a report outlining all the problems and provide suggestions as to how to provide a similar look/feel/functionality, but in an accessible way. At the end off the day it is down to the client, because they are paying. The unfortunate thing is that in reality not many people are going to care enough to do anything about it. I guess you could talk to the DRC, however this will may jeopardise your contract. -- Cheers, Julian Voelcker Cirencester, United Kingdom
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2007 10:18:06 UTC