- From: Tim <dogstar27@optushome.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:21:46 +1000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Dear WAI Interest Group, This is my first post, but I am a bit of an accessibility vetran, a political activist even at testing government and educational websites for accessibility and then displaying the results for the public to see. Any critical comments on my work are most welcome. I just finished an accessibility test of Australian University homepages, some universities have supported my work, others refuse to acknowledge me and claim I am being aggressive in these reviews. Is there a better way to go about promoting accessibility? Training courses seem such a waste of time to me, an excuse for a sandwich picnic. Through this page in the last two weeks, I have managed to get three Universities to improve their homepages for W3C validity, but not much movement yet on accessibility. http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/AustUni.html#skipnav 64% of Australian Universities passed Priority One WCAG 1.0 accessibility tests. 11% of Australian Universities passed Priority Three WCAG 1.0 Checlists In a previous 2006 study comparing the accessibility of government sites in the UK USA and Australia, I found that generally UK sites had fewer html validation errors and more accessibility features than USA or Australian sites. Study design http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/WebSurvey.html Australian government web site tests http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/AustWeb.html USA sites tested for S.508 compliance http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/USAweb.html UK sites tested had fewer errors and more accessibility features http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/UKweb.html Results http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/Results.html Yours Faithfully Tim Anderson The Editor Heretic Press http://www.hereticpress.com Email dogstar27@optushome.com
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2007 03:21:58 UTC