- From: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:10:01 -0500
- To: wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
-- Jonnie Apple Seed With his: Hands-On Technolog(eye)s Begin forwarded message: From: "Mary J. Barnett" <mbassistech@EARTHLINK.NET> Date: February 3, 2006 5:47:57 PM EST To: EASI@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG Subject: Paul Jaeger Wins Award for Doctoral Research at ALISE 2006 in San Antonion TX Reply-To: Equal Access to Software & Information <EASI@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG> Hi, all! I recently attended ALISE (Association for Library and Information Science Education) 2006 in San Antonio. I was pleased to be at the session where Paul Jaeger's first place award for his poster on his doctoral research was announced. Paul has published widely and has been a contributor to the Information Technology and Disabilities E- journal. Following is the research abstract posted on the ALISE site: http:// www.alise.org/conferences/2006_Conference/doc_abstracts.html Information Policy Paul T. Jaeger Florida State University Multi-method Evaluation of U.S. Federal Electronic Government Websites in terms of Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities The study explained in this poster provides a detailed evaluation of the accessibility of selected federal electronic government (e- government) sites for persons with disabilities in terms of the requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. § 794d). Section 508 requires e-government sites to be accessible-- designed and implemented so that persons with disabilities have equal access to them. However, research thus far has found that compliance with Section 508 requirements is low, with many e-government sites remaining inaccessible to persons with disabilities. These previous studies have limited their method primarily to using automated testing software programs, which have shortcomings in their accuracy and thoroughness. Rather than employing only automated testing software programs, this study employs a rigorous accessibility investigation that includes testing by users with disabilities, expert assessments, testing for compatibility with adaptive technologies, testing with automated evaluation software, surveys of federal webmasters, and policy analysis. The more intensive method employed in this research provides a detailed depiction of the accessibility of federal e-government websites that accounts for the needs of persons with different disabilities and evaluates accessibility using multiple methods. Congratulations, Paul!! Mary J. Barnett, Ph.D. Denton, Texas
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2006 00:10:15 UTC