- From: David Clark <david.clark@umb.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:51:48 -0500
- To: Martin Stehle <pewtah@snafu.de>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Martin, > > If one feels the need to display a "badge", aren't WCAG A, AA, And > > AAA the most informative and "impartial"? > > For who? "Claims are not verified by W3C" you can read on e.g. > http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1AAA-Conformance > > And: the scope of the icon? For the whole site? Or for the single > page? And: In WCAG there are no test guidelines, so putting the WCAG > icon is based on a subjective decision. Not sure I understand your question/point --- use of the Bobby Approved icon always had the same limitations and provisions -- its display was always just as subjective.\ Looking back -- (10 years ago this summer) use of the word approved was an unintentional mistake -- it gave Bobby a level of authority (to the casual observer) that we never desired to have . -- dc ps: all opinions expressed are mine, and mine alone.
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 17:51:53 UTC