- From: John S. Britsios <john.britsios@webnauts.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:20:00 +0100
- To: Bryce Fields <bryce.fields@gmail.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I use also Cynthia Says and AccVerify, but manual and with users with disabilities testing is still very important. Though I use these tools with care too: 1. TAW3 - http://www.tawdis.net/taw3/cms/en 2. Webxact Watchfire - http://webxact.watchfire.com/ 3. WAVE - http://dev.wave.webaim.org/index.jsp 4. HERA - http://www.sidar.org/hera/ 5. Torquemada - http://www.webxtutti.it/testa_en.htm 6. Universal Access: Section 508 Web Accessibility Validator - http://condor.gmu.edu/validator/index.php Best, John --- John S. Britsios http://www.webnauts.net Bryce Fields wrote: >On 1/18/06, Beheler Kim <beheler_kim@bah.com> wrote: > > > > >>What are the best Section 508 automatic assessments tools for Software >>applications? >> >> > >Online, I prefer Cynthia Says (http://www.contentquality.com/), and >their professional tool AccVerify is what the Commonwealth of Kentucky >uses. > >However, I want to stress that an automated tool can only check so >much, and the rest must be verified by a human being. No >accessibility assessment is complete if it relies solely on an >automated tool. > >-- >Bryce Fields, Webmaster >http://cpe.ky.gov > >"Do or do not! There is no try!" -- Yoda > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 21:19:31 UTC