w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from January to March 2006 by date

Wednesday, 29 March 2006

• Re: Bugzilla Ben Caldwell
• Re: Question about language tag formalism Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 28 March 2006

• Question about language tag formalism Luc Pardon

Sunday, 26 March 2006

• text equivalents propagated by image indexing Al Gilman

Tuesday, 21 March 2006

• Re: Working Draft Comments Judy Brewer
• Re: Bugzilla UNBRIDLEDTV@aol.com
• RE: Bugzilla Rob Yonaitis - HiSoftware CTO
• Re: Working Draft Comments Ryonaitis@aol.com
• Re: Working Draft Comments Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fwd: Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Working Draft Comments Rob Yonaitis - HiSoftware CTO
• RE: Fwd: Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Patrick Lauke
• RE: Fwd: Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Judy Brewer

Monday, 20 March 2006

• RE: Fwd: Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Web Usability Roger Hudson
• Re: Fwd: Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 17 March 2006

• W4A CALL FOR PAPERS - REMINDER Yeliz Yesilada

Thursday, 16 March 2006

• RE: Display: none Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Display: none Jon Gunderson
• RE: Display: none Jim Tobias

Wednesday, 15 March 2006

• Re: Display: none Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Display: none Paul Novitski

Tuesday, 14 March 2006

• Re: Display: none David Woolley
• Re: Display: none David Woolley
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus David Woolley
• Re: Display: none Paul Novitski
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus Terrence Wood
• Re: Display: none David Dorward
• RE: Display: none Juan Ulloa
• Re: Display: none David Dorward
• Re: Display: none Paul Novitski
• RE: Display: none Juan Ulloa
• Re: Display: none Lloyd Rasmussen
• RE: Display: none Peter Trainor
• RE: Display: none Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Display: none Mike Costello
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus David Poehlman
• RE: linked list alternative to nested menus Léonie Watson
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus David Poehlman

Monday, 13 March 2006

• RE: linked list alternative to nested menus Paul Novitski
• RE: linked list alternative to nested menus Léonie Watson

Sunday, 12 March 2006

• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus Terrence Wood

Saturday, 11 March 2006

• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus Paul Novitski
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus David Woolley
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus David Woolley
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus David Woolley
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus Martin Stehle
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus Paul Novitski

Friday, 10 March 2006

• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus David Woolley
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus David Woolley
• Re: linked list alternative to nested menus Terrence Wood
• RE: linked list alternative to nested menus Paul Novitski
• RE: linked list alternative to nested menus Colin Lieberman
• linked list alternative to nested menus Paul Novitski
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder David Dorward
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder David Woolley

Thursday, 9 March 2006

• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Patrick H. Lauke

Wednesday, 8 March 2006

• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder David Woolley

Tuesday, 7 March 2006

• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Phill Jenkins
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Jon Ribbens
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Isofarro
• Re: Cascading Style Sheets for web accessibility Christophe Strobbe
• Portuguese [Brazilian] localisation of the Web Accessibility Toolbar PT-BR 1.2 Steven Faulkner

Monday, 6 March 2006

• RE: Cascading Style Sheets for web accessibility Léonie Watson

Sunday, 5 March 2006

• Re: Cascading Style Sheets for web accessibility wai-leng wong

Saturday, 4 March 2006

• Re: Cascading Style Sheets for web accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Cascading Style Sheets for web accessibility Anthony Ettinger
• Cascading Style Sheets for web accessibility Adaptive Technology International

Thursday, 2 March 2006

• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Sailesh Panchang
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Martin Stehle

Wednesday, 1 March 2006

• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Sailesh Panchang
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Sailesh Panchang
• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Cynthia Waddell
• Re: Well-argued papers on benefits of high-level markup sought Patrick H. Lauke

Tuesday, 28 February 2006

• W4A 2006 - Final Call for Papers Yeliz Yesilada
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder David Woolley
• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Cheryl D Wise
• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Cynthia Waddell

Monday, 27 February 2006

• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Access Systems
• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Cynthia Waddell
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Access Systems
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Phill Jenkins
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Access Systems
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Access Systems
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Jon Gunderson
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Access Systems
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Jon Gunderson

Saturday, 25 February 2006

• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Patrick H. Lauke

Friday, 24 February 2006

• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Adaptive Technology International
• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Jon Gunderson
• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder David Poehlman
• RE: LIFT Text Transcoder Léonie Watson

Thursday, 23 February 2006

• Re: LIFT Text Transcoder Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Accessible SVG? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Accessible SVG? Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 21 February 2006

• Re: Accessible SVG? David Woolley
• RE: Accessible SVG? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Accessible SVG? Bailey, Bruce

Monday, 20 February 2006

• Re: Proper ALT values for thumbnail images David Poehlman
• RE: Proper ALT values for thumbnail images Patrick Lauke
• Re: Proper ALT values for thumbnail images Martin Stehle
• Re: Proper ALT values for thumbnail images Access Systems
• RE: Proper ALT values for thumbnail images Glenda L Sims
• Proper ALT values for thumbnail images Randal Rust

Saturday, 18 February 2006

• LIFT Text Transcoder ATI
• Re: Accesskeyus interruptus: another real-world case Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 17 February 2006

• WWW2006 Final Call for Participation Yeliz Yesilada

Thursday, 16 February 2006

• Re: Accesskeyus interruptus: another real-world case Orion Adrian
• Re: Accesskeyus interruptus: another real-world case Gez Lemon
• RE: Accesskeyus interruptus: another real-world case Alastair Campbell
• [WebAIM] RE: Accesskeyus interruptus: another real-world case John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Accesskeyus interruptus: another real-world case John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Accessibility design patterns infor) ruben arrizabalaga muniategi
• looking for help ATI
• Re: [WebAIM] FW: [gawds_discuss] Accesskeyus interruptus: another real-world case Gez Lemon
• Re: [WebAIM] FW: [gawds_discuss] Accesskeyus interruptus: anotherreal-world case Gez Lemon

Wednesday, 15 February 2006

• FW: [gawds_discuss] Accesskeyus interruptus: another real-world case John Foliot - WATS.ca

Monday, 13 February 2006

• WAI Presentations at CSUN 2006 Judy Brewer

Friday, 10 February 2006

• European Web Evaluation Methodology - call for commentsextended Eric Velleman
• Call for comments on European Web Accessibility Certification Barry McMullin

Thursday, 9 February 2006

• RE: Access keys conflicting with JAWS key commands John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Access keys conflicting with JAWS key commands David Poehlman
• Access keys conflicting with JAWS key commands Beheler Kim
• Web Accessibility Lawsuit Filed- NFB v. Target Cynthia Waddell

Saturday, 4 February 2006

• Fwd: Paul Jaeger Wins Award for Doctoral Research at ALISE 2006 in San Antonion TX David Poehlman

Friday, 3 February 2006

• RE: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) Colin Lieberman
• RE: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) Patrick Lauke
• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) Jim Ley

Thursday, 2 February 2006

• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) David Woolley
• Re: data table markup - minimal OK or need to specify headers? Terrence Wood
• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) Jim Ley
• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) David Woolley
• RE: Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) Charles McCathieNevile
• data table markup - minimal OK or need to specify headers? Rebecca Cox
• RE: Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 1 February 2006

• Another discontinued Watchfire product... Jacob Rose
• Re: until user agent and baseline David Poehlman
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? David Poehlman
• RE: "untill user agents" retired? Alastair Campbell
• RE: "untill user agents" retired? Alastair Campbell
• until user agent and baseline Web Usability Roger Hudson
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? David Poehlman

Tuesday, 31 January 2006

• Re: "untill user agents" retired? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) David Dorward
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? David Poehlman
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? David Poehlman
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? David Poehlman
• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) David Woolley
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? David Poehlman
• RE: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: "untill user agents" retired? Alastair Campbell
• RE: "untill user agents" retired? Juan Ulloa
• RE: "untill user agents" retired? Patrick Lauke
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? David Poehlman
• RE: "untill user agents" retired? Patrick Lauke
• Re: "untill user agents" retired? Christophe Strobbe
• "untill user agents" retired? David Poehlman
• RE: Google Adsense code is not valid and not accessible Alastair Campbell
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) Julian Scarlett
• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Myhill, Carl S \(GE Infra, Energy\)
• RE: Google Adsense code is not valid and not accessible Michael R. Burks
• Re: Google Adsense code is not valid and not accessible Cindy Sue Causey

Monday, 30 January 2006

• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) Jim Ley
• Thank you so much re accesskeys Janet Perkins Corbett
• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) Anthony Ettinger
• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) David Dorward
• Re: Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) David Woolley
• Re: Google Adsense code is not valid and not accessible Jon Hanna
• Reasons for not using <noscript> (was: Google Adsense ... not accessible) Matthew Smith

Sunday, 29 January 2006

• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Chuck Hitchcock
• RE: Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) John Foliot - WATS.ca

Saturday, 28 January 2006

• Re: Google Adsense code is not valid and not accessible Ryonaitis@aol.com
• Re: Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) David Poehlman
• Re: Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) Martin Stehle
• Re: Google Adsense code is not valid and not accessible Jim Ley
• Re: Google Adsense code is not valid and not accessible David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility features David Woolley
• errata corridge Laboo
• Google Adsense code is not valid and not accessible Laboo
• Accesskeys (was RE: Accessibility features) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Accessibility features Patrick H. Lauke
• Accessibility features Janet Perkins Corbett

Friday, 27 January 2006

• ANNOUNCEMENT: On-line Course on Universal Design of Web Jon Gunderson
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? David Clark
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Martin Stehle
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Bryce Fields
• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Stuart Smith
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Joshue O Connor
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Jon Gunderson
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Sailesh Panchang, Deque
• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Mark D. Urban
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? David Clark
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Chris Ridpath
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Bryce Fields
• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? John Colby
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? David Clark
• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Julian Scarlett
• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? John Colby
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Martin Stehle
• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Lee, Amanda E.
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Julian Voelcker
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Ryonaitis@aol.com
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Martin Stehle
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Jens Meiert
• RE: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Patrick Lauke
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Martin Stehle
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Bryce Fields
• Re: Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Kerstin Goldsmith
• Where's Bobby? Are we left with Cynthia? Myhill, Carl S \(GE Infra, Energy\)

Thursday, 26 January 2006

• Accessibility one reason IBM's intranet is top 10 in world Phill Jenkins

Friday, 20 January 2006

• Re: source order, skip links and structural labels David Poehlman
• RE: source order, skip links and structural labels Alastair Campbell
• Re: source order, skip links and structural labels Web Usability Roger Hudson

Thursday, 19 January 2006

• Re: software application assessment tools Phill Jenkins

Wednesday, 18 January 2006

• Re: source order, skip links and structural labels Terrence Wood
• Re: software application assessment tools John S. Britsios
• Re: software application assessment tools David Woolley
• Re: software application assessment tools Bryce Fields
• Business case for e-accessibility? Barry McMullin
• software application assessment tools Beheler Kim
• RE: Colour contrast on logos Patrick Lauke
• Re: Colour contrast on logos Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Colour contrast on logos Roel Van Gils
• Colour contrast on logos Robert Walpole
• source order, skip links and structural labels Web Usability Roger Hudson

Tuesday, 17 January 2006

• Accessible Internet Banking: Australia Matthew Smith

Monday, 16 January 2006

• Re: Automated Testing Tool John S. Britsios
• Automated Testing Tool Randal Rust

Saturday, 14 January 2006

• Element overloading issue - h3 is both form label and link Matthew Smith

Thursday, 12 January 2006

• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) David Woolley
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Geoff Deering
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Orion Adrian
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Geoff Deering
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Geoff Deering

Wednesday, 11 January 2006

• RE: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Orion Adrian
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Geoff Deering
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Geoff Deering
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Orion Adrian
• RE: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) John Foliot - WATS.ca

Tuesday, 10 January 2006

• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Geoff Deering
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Geoff Deering
• Re: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Geoff Deering
• RE: Accesskey Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Franseth, Greg
• RE: Accesskey Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Accesskey Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Franseth, Greg
• RE: Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Key bindings... (user agents - was accesskey was ...) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Accesskey Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Orion Adrian

Monday, 9 January 2006

• Re: Accesskey Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Geoff Deering
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? David Woolley
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Phill Jenkins
• Accesskey Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Geoff Deering
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Geoff Deering
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Geoff Deering
• RE: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Phill Jenkins
• RE: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Colin Lieberman
• RE: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Lois Wakeman
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Elizabeth J. Pyatt
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Access Systems
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Geoff Deering
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Geoff Deering
• RE: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Patrick Lauke
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Geoff Deering
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? David Woolley
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Geoff Deering
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org.au
• Re: <span> within a word any issue for screen readers? Sofia.Celic@nils.org.au

Wednesday, 4 January 2006

• @media 2006 , London, 15th-16th June Patrick H. Lauke

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 March 2006 19:57:37 UTC