- From: Matthew Harris <mharris@morpheum.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:11:58 +1000
- To: "'Alastair Campbell'" <ac@nomensa.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi everyone To be honest, you have been talking about WCAG 2.0 for years now and how about just getting it out so we can all improve our usability and accessibility. Regards Matt Harris An Aussie waiting in anticipation and stop the procrastination -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alastair Campbell Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:41 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: WCAG 2.0 Reflections - 3.4 equivelent? Hi everyone, I'm not disagreeing with Wayne, but I've noticed that there doesn't seem to be any advice on layout (in the HTML techniques for example). This is why I ask: http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=37960 Someone asked about WCAG v1 checkpoint 3.4, relative units, someone else started talking about conformance (in v2) because I suggested that you don't have to apply relative units to every element. Is it just me not finding it, an omission, something to be added later, or is it seen as out of scope? Kind regards, -Alastair -- Alastair Campbell | Director of User Experience Nomensa Email Disclaimer: http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer.html
Received on Wednesday, 17 May 2006 11:13:00 UTC