- From: Colin Lieberman <clieberman@dralegal.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:23:10 -0700
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
The way we address this where I work is via the accessibility policy on our site. We use this language: # 10.4 User testing indicated that our entire audience possesses user agents capable of navigating text input fields without having placeholder text in them. Thus, we deemed that the “until user agents” section of this checkpoint was fulfilled. Note: some accessibility testing programs may give an error on this checkpoint when checking our website. Again, we believe that we have indeed fulfilled this guideline, and that including placeholder text would have been counterproductive for accessibility. This guideline is archaic and is set to be deprecated in WCAG 2.0. Colin Lieberman IT Manager Disability Rights Advocates 2001 Center Street, Third Floor Berkeley, California 94704-1204 510 665 8644 x.134 (Tel) 510 665 8716 (TTY) 510 665 8511 (Fax) -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Laboo Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:04 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Use of pre-compilated text-fields in forms Hallo the automatic validation http://webxact.watchfire.com/ (I think is the strongest ) requires visible text in textfields; naturally is a big sacrifice for graphic appeal of a site. Is there any valid alternative to pass this hard accessibility validation?? thanks Laboo Roberto Federico info@laboo.it - www.laboo.it - www.laboo.biz/pa/ - www.laboo.biz/infogatto/
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:23:41 UTC