- From: Elizabeth J. Pyatt <ejp10@psu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:30:33 -0500
- To: David Dorward <david@us-lot.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Sorry for misusing the word "tag", but I trust most knew which attribute I was referring to. ;) Elizabeth >On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:53:05AM -0500, Elizabeth J. Pyatt wrote: > >> As far as using lists go, I actually use HTML (vs. XHTML) because I >> feel that when XHTML got rid of the TYPE= tag, it opened up the >> door for potential accessibility issue. > >Not that I want to encourage the use of XHTML, but the type >attribute[1], was deprecated and relegated to the Transitional >Doctypes in HTML 4, and remained in the Transitional doctype of XHTML >1.0 (which is a silly language to use on the WWW), and lets not bother >talking about XHTML 1.1 (which is an insane language to use on the >WWW). > > >[1] Not a tag. Its an attribute. > >-- >David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Elizabeth J. Pyatt, Ph.D. Instructional Designer Education Technology Services, TLT/ITS Penn State University ejp10@psu.edu, (814) 865-0805 or (814) 865-2030 (Main Office) 210 Rider Building II 227 W. Beaver Avenue State College, PA 16801-4819 http://www.personal.psu.edu/ejp10/psu http://tlt.psu.edu
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2005 14:40:51 UTC