- From: Eadie, David <D.Eadie@gcal.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:17:06 -0000
- To: "Gautier Barrere" <barrere@gmail.com>, "wai-ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <09FFF345110913458F1C9D8850F41D60D569A5@EXCHANGE.enterprise.gcal.ac.uk>
Hi Gautier, This is an interesting problem. Whilst some authors would not include an expansion for commonly-used acronyms/abbreviations one might question their ability to decide what is common and understood by all. It might be the case that a common abbreviation whose meaning is understood by a web developer is not understood by a user who suffers from, for example, a learning or age-related impairment. Further, I'm sure that I've recently read that, due to the problems some web developers have in deciding whether something should be an acronym or an abbreviation, the ACRONYM element is to be deprecated in favour of the ABBR element. To illustrate the confusion whic exists, I'm sure that my old English teacher - Scottish education! - would not have viewed DTA as an acronym as the abbreviation did not form a pronounceable word. Whereas some other education systems may view DTA as an acronym. Finally, can I throw the cat amongst the proverbial pigeons and ask whether or not you should use an ABBR element for all occurences of an abbreviation in a web page. Users who suffer from a learning or age-related impairment might benefit from such a strategy; as might someone who, as a result of the website's navigation strategy, has been allowed to link to the middle of a web page's content thus missing the first expanded form of the abbreviation. Cheers, Dave David Eadie Lecturer Innovation & Business Growth Caledonian Business School Glasgow Caledonian University Tel: 0141-331-8775 Fax: 0141-331-3199 email: d.eadie@gcal.ac.uk -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gautier Barrere Sent: 22 November 2005 10:50 To: wai-ig Subject: 4.2 WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint Hi all ! I have a question concerning the 4.2 WCAG 1.0 checkpoint "Specify the expansion of each abbreviation or acronym in a document where it first occurs". What should I do if there is this sentence in my webpage : <body> Welcome to the Dallas tennis association (DTA) <body> Should I indicate again the expansion like following : <body> Welcome to the Dallas tennis association <ACRONYM title="Dallas tennis association">DTA</ACRONYM><body> I think the first version is the better, the aim of the guideline is not to provide redundant information. Could you help me ? Gautier. Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service <http://www.altman.co.uk/emailsystems>
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 16:17:22 UTC