- From: Colin Lieberman <clieberman@dralegal.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:08:24 -0800
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: 20051118120827.GA90114@mail26b.sbc-webhosting.com>
Paul - I assume you mean accessibility testing for websites. There are a number of tools that I've found helpful, but as you know, it is important to note that none of them are effective in absence of real human testing. Watchfire WebXact (http://www.webxact.com <http://www.webxact.com/> ) is good starting point, as it shows you where some of the biggest problems lie. If webxact finds a recurring priority 1 error, you know you've got something that needs attention. Chris Pederik's Web Developer's Toolbar for Firefox (http://chrispederick.com/work/webdeveloper/) is also an excellent tool. It helps you evaluate a site's functionality when css and/or javascript disabled. It also will quickly outline any images that are missing alt text, and it will let you do a number of other things are quite helpful in accessibility testing. Unless you have your own license for screen reading software, it can be hard to get handle on how the site will be read. While it's not a substitute for screen reading software, the lynx text-only browser (http://www.fredlwm.hpg.ig.com.br/cygwin/lynx/) can give you an idea of some of the problems a screen reader may encounter. Colin Lieberman IT Manager Disability Rights Advocates 449 15th Street, Suite 303 Oakland California 94612 _____ From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Collins Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:43 AM To: WebAIM Discussion List; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Best automated Accessibility evaluation tool Looking at Accessibility evaluation software, could anyone recommend the best tool for all-round evaluation? And yes, I will be doing human testing also! Thanks, Paul
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 17:08:37 UTC