- From: Jim Tobias <tobias@inclusive.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:53:18 -0500
- To: "'Patrick Lauke'" <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>, "'WebAIM Discussion List'" <webaim-forum@list.webaim.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Is there a "best tool overall", or rather a (small) set of tools, each of which is best at one part of automated testing? I'm assuming the latter. I ask because many well-intentioned clients are looking for such a set. Their other criteria are reliability and ease of use. Their goal is to split web accessibility into two parts: automated testing performed by relatively untrained testing technicians, and complex testing performed by highly trained usability/accessibility engineers. I can't fault their goal; can you? Given WAI's defensible "no recommendations" policy, there seems to be no coordinated public source for good general guidance on automated tools. At the least, there *should* be an agreed-upon list of which guidelines can be robo-tested, and which tools perform satisfactorily. I can't find such a resource; am I missing something? *********** Jim Tobias Inclusive Technologies tobias@inclusive.com +732.441.0831 v/tty www.inclusive.com > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Lauke > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:01 AM > To: WebAIM Discussion List; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: RE: [WebAIM] Best automated Accessibility evaluation tool > > > Paul Collins > > Looking at Accessibility evaluation software, could anyone > recommend the best tool for all-round evaluation?
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 13:53:42 UTC