- From: Geoff Deering <geoff@deering.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:40:34 +1100
- To: Matthew Smith <matt@kbc.net.au>
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Matthew Smith wrote: >As yet, I haven't found anything that I really like "out of the box" >but, as time allows, I am playing around with Drupal[1] and think that >this only needs minor tweaks. Drupal is the only CMS with which I have >been at all happy. Had I the time, or if a client had a requirement, I >would be inclined to write something myself. > > > I agree with this, but try adding a lot of modules and building a feature rich web site and your start to see Drupal buckle under the load, IMHO. >>From my experience with Wordpress - and I think that this would apply to > "normal" CMS as well - apart from a few patches that I have written[2], >the biggest hinderance to accessibility has been in the themes/templates >rather than the base code. This is something that can be addressed >without having to pull the programme apart. > > > I think there needs to be a very clear definition here between a true CMS that does have proper workflow features for an organisation hierarchy and those that are for blogging. Admittedly a lot of people use WordPress, Movable Type and Texttile in this way, but I don't think they have the feature set that really qualify them as enterprise CMSs, even though they do a lot of things much better than the larger CMSs. Regards Geoff Deering
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 00:40:39 UTC