Re: Accessibility for Deaf

On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Leslie K. Yoder wrote:

> Bob wrote (in part):
> > I long ago learned to ask the affected people which term they prefer.
> > there will be differences but you can hardly ever go wrong with
> > "people/person first"
> Hi, Bob.
>
> I know you gave a different example, and this is undoubtedly not what you
> meant, but your comment above could be taken to mean that "people who are
> dumb" is an okay alternative.

only if you can find a significant number of the people you are talking
about to agree it is acceptable to them....."people who are speech
impaired" works fine

Bob

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
CONFIGURE YOUR E-MAIL TO SEND TEXT ONLY, see http://expita.com/nomime.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety",    Benjamin Franklin
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named

Received on Saturday, 8 October 2005 14:43:36 UTC