- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:18:51 +0200
- To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- CC: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
> > It's quite a devastating analysis and calls into question the WCAG > Working Group's interest in making as many guidelines as possible > machine-checkable. Thank you Joe and Gez. We also need to remember that Human testing is not always the same as user testing... I was asking someone about the new working draft, and they asked me if the orentaion and focus pf WCAG has changed the help the emphasis was towards helping the designed at the expense of the perspective of disabled user . I am not saying I agree but I think we need to think about it. Checklist type testability is really useful for the designer. User testing on the other hand focuses the user. All the best Lisa
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:34:20 UTC