- From: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:21:16 -0400
- To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Cc: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In his follow up, perhaps he could use the tools as they are intended to be used. -- Jonnie Apple Seed With His: Hands-On Technolog(eye)s On Aug 8, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Joe Clark wrote: National treasure Gez Lemon wrote a test page with known validation and WCAG errors and ran it through various automated checking tools, none of which caught more than a few of the errors, if that. <http://juicystudio.com/article/invalid-content-accessibility- validators.php> It's quite a devastating analysis and calls into question the WCAG Working Group's interest in making as many guidelines as possible machine-checkable. He'll have a follow-up next week. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 01:21:33 UTC