- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 21:57:08 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- CC: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Wendy Chisholm wrote: > The 30 June 2005 Working Draft of WCAG 2.0 says, "The Working Group > believes that all success criteria should be testable. Tests can be done > by computer programs or by people who understand this document. I'd say the core problem here lies with the "or" in that last sentence. It implies that *all* tests can be done by *either* a computer *or* a person. You would probably want something more along the lines of: "Carrying out the entire series of tests will require people who understand this document. However, some (or even "a small subset of") tests can be automated / performed by computer programs." -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 20:57:19 UTC