- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:24:40 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
fstorr wrote: > My company is using the services of an external usability company and > are making a recommendation to use small inline icons within <a> tags > when linking to Office/PDF documents. > Their argument is that the icon > would contain alt text to make it accessible, but that's fine for blind > users but not for those who aren't but just need some very large > content. I'd say that the fact it doesn't scale only causes problems up to a certain point, after which users with severe impairments are more likely to use screen magnification and/or lower screen resolution to compensate, rather than simply bumping up browser text size. Ideally I'd do both: have an icon (placed via CSS, not inline IMG element...just create classes for "word", "pdf" etc and assign those to the A elements) that makes it visually obvious what type of file you're referring to, as well as a slightly smaller, bracketed piece of info after the link that states in plain text what type of file it is and possibly the file size. If those links are all on one page, I'd have an introductory text that states the files open in a new window, and additionally a title on the A elements reiterating the name, type, size and "opens in a new window"). Overkill? Perhaps, but you may do some clever styling on the extra info, for instance, and offer alternate stylesheets, etc. -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2005 20:24:46 UTC