- From: Marjolein Katsma <iamback4now@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 01:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
--- David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > EG: <a href="#" title="example link">example link</a> > > Please don't give examples of this bad practice (common symptom > is dead links because the page only works with scripting present > and enabled and compatible with the browser). href should always > be a vaid URL that leads to the correct place (or at least to > a page that achieves the effect of the scripting without using > scripting). > > In any case, are empty fragment names allowed? According to the RFC (2396) yes: Syntax: - (section 4): URI-reference = [ absoluteURI | relativeURI ] [ "#" fragment ] - (section 4.1): fragment = *uric (that's zero or more uri characters) Given this syntax it's perfectly valid to have a URI reference consisting of nothing but a #. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt -- Marjolein Katsma Travel blog: http://iamback.com/blog/ Report spam: http://banspam.javawoman.com/report3.html Skype: callto://goneagain ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 08:05:50 UTC