- From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:50:48 -0500
- To: "Alastair Campbell" <ac@nomensa.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
This is part of my point though, part of the power lies in the user agent camp. There is nothing rong with a navigation bar. There is a lot rong with they way they are implemented whether it is an authoring decision or a user agent/assistive technology decision. Johnnie Apple Seed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alastair Campbell" <ac@nomensa.com> To: "david poehlman" <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com> Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:38 AM Subject: Re: Copywriting for Screenreaders (was Alt text for URL's) david poehlman wrote: > If we need to skip it, te question becomes, what is rong with it that it > needs to be skipped? The answer lies somewhere in te reasoning beind its > invention in the first place and that is to allow for the skipping of > "repetative" links. I think an example of a good site without a consistent navigation bar would help me to understand your point here? Kind regards, -Alastair -- Alastair Campbell | Director of Research & Development Please refer to the following disclaimer for this message: http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer.html
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 14:14:19 UTC