- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:08:06 +0100 (CET)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 1 Feb, Kelly Pierce wrote: > specified task. You may choose not to use Internet Explorer, but in > 2005 I have not seen an argument saying that it is unreasonable or > insufficient to require people with disabilities only to use Internet > Explorer to access online banking services. It seems like you want > access beyond what is required beyond that of the ADA. Are we to understand that the ADA allows a bank to require a solution provided by one, not associated by the bank, commerical actor? Is the cost of operating system and hardware covered by the bank? If solution A is delivered ONLY by commercial actor B, and cost money, then yes, it would seem -entirely- unreasonable and insufficient. Can you elaborate? -- - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2005 14:08:10 UTC