- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:29:47 +0100 (CET)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 14 Jan, B.K. DeLong wrote: > have both. When there is no caption, there is a summary. However with > both a caption and table summary, it's getting redundant since we > specifically word the caption to explain exactly what's in the table. I think you need to look at what "caption" and "summary" really mean. The caption is a title, or a brief explanation - let's call it something said about the table's purpose. On the other hand, the summary can be described as a brief statement of the main points of the contents in the table. The two should, in my view, both be present, not overlap, and certainly describe different sides to the table and the data. > How do screenreaders handle this? I don't think that is particulary interesting. As content providers we need to structure up information for what it is, and expect the tools used to handle them in the same way. As long as we, and they (being tool authors) agree on what a certain structure mean, it isn't really neccessary for us to know exactly how the tool deals with said structure. After all, if the tool doesn't know a certain structure and the predefined semantics of it, then it can't handle it at all. If it does know, then it'll deal with the information in a way that fits the reality that tool exist in. -- - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Friday, 14 January 2005 15:29:50 UTC