- From: zara <zara@arobas.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:43:38 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi, I am doing a bit of research on the state of accessibility in e-learning courseware. I've been told by someone on another list that the days of centralized courseware are counted and that the future lies in Service Oriented Architectures for éducation (for example, see ELF[1]), based on Web services, thus a assemblage of independent components that communicate together with the help of standards developed by IMS, IEEE, ISO, OASIS, etc. That this corresponds more to the needs of organisations that already have certain services set up and only wish to have a few services offered by a LMS and that this displaces the accessibility problem from centralized LMS towards the various components that are chosen. I am curious to know what effect this may have on accessibility. To my mind, it sounds promising as long as there are components available that take into account accessibility standards (I imagine that in certain countries, like the USA, this is less problematic as standards are compulsory but in my part of the world, much of what is being developed here still fails to take this into consideration). Also, I would like to know how most courseware is fairing accessibility-wise as there are still a lot of organisations using them. Besides A-Tutor, where accessibility is a major concern, how are the others doing ? Any thoughts or info would be greatly appreciated. Catherine -- [1] http://www.elframework.org/ ___________________________ Catherine Roy www.w3qc.org www.communautique.qc.ca http://perso.b2b2c.ca/zara/ ___________________________
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 22:43:51 UTC