- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:41:16 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 6/7/05, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:55:59AM -0400, Orion Adrian wrote: > > > I took one look at an example RDF page and knew I would never use it. > > It took reading page after page of documentation on it to figure out > > even close to what it was doing. It isn't immediately obvious which it > > needs to be. I think one key problem it has is that it was force-fed > > into an XML formate when a custom data format would have been better. > > For instance: > > > > <item> <relationship> <item>[, <item>]* > > <item> <relationship> <item>[, <item>]* > > That's what n3 is for. > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer.html > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/ > This is what RDF should have looked like in the beginning. This should have come first and then who needs RDF in XML. Orion Adrian
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:41:43 UTC