Re: Re: Accessibility of "CHM" format resources

On 6/7/05, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:55:59AM -0400, Orion Adrian wrote:
> 
> > I took one look at an example RDF page and knew I would never use it.
> > It took reading page after page of documentation on it to figure out
> > even close to what it was doing. It isn't immediately obvious which it
> > needs to be. I think one key problem it has is that it was force-fed
> > into an XML formate when a custom data format would have been better.
> > For instance:
> >
> > <item> <relationship> <item>[, <item>]*
> > <item> <relationship> <item>[, <item>]*
> 
> That's what n3 is for.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer.html
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/
> 

This is what RDF should have looked like in the beginning. This should
have come first and then who needs RDF in XML.

Orion Adrian

Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:41:43 UTC