- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 16:52:37 -0500
- To: "Vicente Luque Centeno" <vlc@it.uc3m.es>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: <jon@hackcraft.net>
Vicente wrote: <blockquote> You can find that paragraph at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-HTML-TECHS/#imagelink (according to the link I provided just above my blockquote). So, yes, I disagree with what is said at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-HTML-TECHS/#imagelink . </blockquote> Ah. Somehow I missed your link-- I think I was quoting from a message that responded to yours. Sorry. To clarify, however, you were quoting from the current working draft of the HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0, and not from the current working draft of WCAG 2.0 itself. And we owe you thanks for discovering a mismatch between the current wording of the success criterion at Guideline 1.1 Level 1 SC1 and the wording in the HTML technique for images usd as links. John "Good design is accessible design" John Slatin, Ph.D. Senior Accessibility Specialist RampWEB, Inc. phone +1.512.266.6189 email jslatin@rampweb.com www.rampweb.com -----Original Message----- From: Vicente Luque Centeno [mailto:vlc@it.uc3m.es] Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 4:44 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Cc: John M Slatin; jon@hackcraft.net Subject: RE: Text for images used as links You can find that paragraph at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-HTML-TECHS/#imagelink (according to the link I provided just above my blockquote). So, yes, I disagree with what is said at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-HTML-TECHS/#imagelink .
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2005 21:52:40 UTC