- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 07:26:40 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> That shows that Google indexed the frameset's noframes content. It does > NOT, however, give me any indication whether or not Googlebot then > proceeded to follow the various frames...so it's a bit of an empty Even if it did follow the frame references, I doubt that it returns the frameset URL, which would be needed for it to fully support frames. Also, the fundamental reason why frames are bad for the world wide web applies here in that there is no way for Google to specify a URL that causes the display of anything other than the initial frameset or an individual frame; it cannot say, load this frameset then load this sequence of URLs into corresponding frames, at least not with current browsers. In any case, one deep link to the frame could make it think that the frame could be used in isolation. Many designers completely forget this. Others try to use scripting to force people to the home page, losing the benefit of the search engine URL to the specific information required. Others may use anti- deep linking strategies to redirect to the primary home page with a similar effect but less easy to defeat without using the Google cache.
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 06:30:25 UTC