- From: David Balch <david.balch@continuing-education.oxford.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:41:32 +0100
- To: 'david poehlman' <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: david poehlman [mailto:david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com] > Sent: 13 May 2005 13:34 > > The short answer is no unless you are using it in a link. > Alt replaces, it does not describe. But if the accompanying caption contains text that fulfils the same function as the image it should be ok to leave alt blank, surely? I fear that my use of the word "describe" distracted from the real question I was posing. Cheers, Dave. > -----Original Message----- > From: david poehlman [mailto:david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com] > Sent: 13 May 2005 13:34 > To: David Balch; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: Is an empty alt attribute ok when... > > The short answer is no unless you are using it in a link. > Alt replaces, it does not describe. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Balch" <david.balch@continuing-education.oxford.ac.uk> > To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 8:11 AM > Subject: Is an empty alt attribute ok when... > > > > Hi, > > I'm writing a short guide describing the information that > should accompany > images in content my group produces: title, caption, attribution, > alternative equivilant. > > I would apprieciate feedback on the approach I've taken to alternative > equivilant content. In particular, a case where the > information content of > the image is described in the image caption - is it > acceptable to leave the > alt attribute empty? (See the "Covalent bonding in a molecule > of water" > part.) > > http://tall.conted.ox.ac.uk/testarea/david/image/ImageExamples.html > > > Cheers, > Dave. > > -- > David Balch. | Web developer. > T: +44 (0)1865 280979 | Technology-Assisted Lifelong Learning. > F: +44 (0)1865 280982 | University of Oxford. > E: david.balch@conted.ox.ac.uk > > TALL, OUDCE and the University of Oxford accept no legal > responsibility for > the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented > are only those > of the author and not those of TALL, or OUDCE, or the > University of Oxford. > If this email has come to you in error please delete it and > any attachments > > >
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 15:41:43 UTC