- From: Stuart Smith <Stuart.M.Smith@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 15:34:21 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Balch Sent: 13 May 2005 13:11 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Is an empty alt attribute ok when... Hi, I'm writing a short guide describing the information that should accompany images in content my group produces: title, caption, attribution, alternative equivilant. I would apprieciate feedback on the approach I've taken to alternative equivilant content. In particular, a case where the information content of the image is described in the image caption - is it acceptable to leave the alt attribute empty? (See the "Covalent bonding in a molecule of water" part.) http://tall.conted.ox.ac.uk/testarea/david/image/ImageExamples.html ----REPLY---- Hi I think the best way to look at is if you can to get a non-sighted to use the page with their screen reader. Given that this will inform your organisations policy it would seem a very worthwhile endeavour. Failing that then try using something like Webbie [http://www.webbie.org.uk/] which renders a web page for use with a screen reader (it's free and useful for sighted people who want to get an idea of the non-sighted experience). If after one or both of those tests the page seems to be making sense then I would suggest giving the policy ago. Cheers Stuart
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 14:34:24 UTC