- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:30:26 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> I would apprieciate feedback on the approach I've taken to alternative > equivilant content. In particular, a case where the > information content of > the image is described in the image caption - is it > acceptable to leave the > alt attribute empty? (See the "Covalent bonding in a molecule > of water" > part.) I'd say so, better than most of the others on that page. It's hard to think of a context where "Half a plate of fried noodles, from the viewpoint of someone eating them with chopsticks." would be an appropriate alt text. It's a description of the image, not an alternative means to do what the image does in a given page. Such descriptions (or even more detailed perhaps) belong in longdesc pages. The graph and the diagram of a water molecule are images that could particularly benefit from longdesc pages. Regards, Jon Hanna Work: <http://www.selkieweb.com/> Play: <http://www.hackcraft.net/> Chat: <irc://irc.freenode.net/selkie>
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 12:30:36 UTC