- From: ZZALSSMS ZZALSSMS <Stuart.M.Smith@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:47:30 GMT
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi Janet Thanks for clarifying and providing the example links. I think any site using this tool is going to be difficult to use with a screen reader and certainly I think Headers are going to be needed to help it improve. The tool clearly has a lot of power and of course your institution may be implmenting it differently but the examples you have show display interfaces that are incredible complex to follow and difficult to alter. I realise that the tool is capable of a lot but if the functionality cannot be exploited by the user properly then it might as well not exist. I think those with cognitive difficulties are going to struggle because there is no real way they can focus using this. Sorry if that seems a bit negative on the otherside because it is CSS driven I think things could be done. Could the vendors be lobbied for "bug fix" given that it is meant to produce useful HTML, it doesn't appear to be doing so? Cheers Stuart > > Stuart and all > > Yes, I'm referring to the header tags outputted in HTML. The portal > pages consist of categories ("channels" in SCT land) of info with short > descriptions of the categories with links to the actual info or service. > The software used to create the pages doesn't make the visual category > headers into actual HTML headers, which I think is really dumb! > > Anyway, when the whole page is read, the category info is read, but when > a screenreader user wants to use a headings list, there aren't any - > except for the categories where the developer has used headings (few and > far between). And, since eventually people like department secretaries > will be maintaining these "channels", if the development team member in > charge of accessibility (me) doesn't specify what to do, it won't get > done. > > The links list, which I tried to replicate in my previous e-mail, is > fairly useless. > > Oh, I should note that I'm basing my evaluation on the use of "Fangs" > with Firefox, an extension which simulates screen reader output. I will > go use Jaws on campus today or tomorrow. > > Our implementation isn't yet viewable by the general public, but here > are some that are: > > Colorado State University: > http://rampoint.colostate.edu/cp/home/loginf > Click on "View Student Demo" or" View > Faculty/Staff Demo". > > Savannah College of Art and Design: > http://myscad.scad.edu/cp/home/loginf > Click on "students", "faculty" > or "staff" in "online tutorials for students, faculty and staff". > > Wayne State University: http://lumprod.wayne.edu/cp/home/loginf > Enter a WSU AccessID of "wsuguest" with a > password of "warrior" and click OK. This gives guest access to their > system. > > Janet > > > Hi Janet > > Can you clarify what is meant by the "headings list"? I think that if > you > are referring to the header tags outputted in HTML then not only will > screen > reader users benefit from them but also all users in general as they add > structure to the page. > > Cheers > > Stuart > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Janet Perkins Corbett > Sent: 03 May 2005 01:37 > To: webaim-forum@list.webaim.org; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Use of headings > > > Hello > > Our university is implementing Sungard-SCT's Luminis portal software, > we're in the development stage. My role is to ensure that our > implementation is as accessible as it can be. There is much to be > desired about the entire software package, but one thing that I thought > might be do-able is to encourage the use of headings in channels. Here's > my question: do screen reader users depend much on the headings list? > > The current list of headings is empty for most pages. > > The list of links yields something like the following: focus minimize > focus minimize focus minimize delete focus minimize delete j a dash sig > homepage > Etc. > > > Janet Perkins Corbett > Wyoming INstitute for Disabilities > http://wind.uwyo.edu/ > (307)766-2506 > perky@uwyo.edu > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2005 13:47:48 UTC