- From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:55:11 -0400
- To: "John Foliot - WATS.ca" <foliot@wats.ca>, "'Access Systems'" <accessys@smart.net>
- Cc: "'W3c-Wai-Ig'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
What does this have to do with anti-anything? Our point here is that according to their blurb, the web fits in here. In other words,when authors and authoring agents grab hold of this stuff and find they need to code a certain way in order to display/render properly in the new world, it may well break further cross platform capability. I am saying this is my fear but we are talking about something that is not even close to being released. -- Johnnie Apple Seed ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Foliot - WATS.ca" <foliot@wats.ca> To: "'david poehlman'" <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>; "'Access Systems'" <accessys@smart.net> Cc: "'W3c-Wai-Ig'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:49 AM Subject: RE: Fwd: Avalon? david poehlman wrote: > every thing that has not been releasedsounds like a better > solution than is > currently available. My fear is that in orderto make things > accessible to the next gen of windows,we'll have to break even more > the > cross platform > model. > Am I the only one here who sees this as mixing apples and oranges? What does this have to do with web accessibility? Outside of the fact that Microsoft is talking about making elements of the UI (User Interface) more readily available to Windows applications, what does this have to do with "web content", Macintosh, Linux or any other operating system. This sounds more like stuff for code wranglers of the C++ variety. Check your anti-Microsoft bias at the door please... JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca Phone: 1-613-267-1983 / 1-866-932-4878 (North America)
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:55:15 UTC