- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 22:19:44 +1000
- To: "Myhill, Carl S (GE Energy)" <carl.myhill@ps.ge.com>, "W3C WAI-IG" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 20:59:57 +1000, Myhill, Carl S (GE Energy) <carl.myhill@ps.ge.com> wrote: > Firstly, please forgive my ignorance on this topic, which I'm not even > sure how to ask about. > > Personally, I think accessibility should be a primary consideration in > software design, particularly on the web. So, legislation moving us in > that direction has my vote. I work hard to make my own website > accessible (though it's not actually that hard, just a bit of learning > needed). Note that you and I vote in different countries. (Actually as an Australian taking up overseas residence I am about to lose my right to vote, but it's still true). More to the point, questions on legislation are often pretty parochial. > However, is there a category of software which has some kind of exemption > from accessibility legislation? For example, I would asssume that an air > traffic control system would not need to be made accessible. Is that > correct? Can anyone point me to regulations on such things? Or provide > any other kind of insight? Sure. There is a whole raft of legislation on the topic in Morocco. How's your Arabic? :-) Seriously, even in english speaking countries there are a raft of different exemptions. WHile Section 508 generally exempts Intelligence gathering (read "the CIA, NoSuchAgency, FBI, etc), the Australian Disability Discrimination Act provides higher barriers for them than for the local high school to prove that it is not reasonable to insist on accessibility in some area or other. Consult your local legal advisory board... cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar charles@sidar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2005 12:19:52 UTC