- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 12:21:34 +1000
- To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:06:35 +1000, David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> If they both work, what is the benefit of using labels over the title >> attribute? > > Label is designed for the purpose, and, if used properly, refers to > text that will be visible even if the browser doesn't understand > label. There is no requirement on browsers to force title onto > users; it might only be presented if requested by the user, and, as > it is an HTML 4 addition, might not be recognized by some browsers. Most of what David says is correct, but label and title are both from HTML 4 - 1990s technology that many browsers are finaly managing to implement now, and I don't think that is an argument one way or another. Title works for a particular small set of technology - screen readers, used by most of the very small proportion of blind Web users, some people with low vision, and a few people with reading disabilities*. For visual users, including people with low vision, various disabilities that mean you only see part of the field of vision, difficulties in reading or understaning "typical" conventions, the title attribute often doesn't help much, because until you navigatetothe box you don't find out what it does. cheers Chaals *who are quite possibly the biggest group on the web, but who generally don't manage to justify the cost of commercial screen readers, and don't think of cheaper options like Home Page Reader or Opera. I wonder if this will change as linux-based screen readers become more graphics-friendly. -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar charles@sidar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org
Received on Friday, 1 April 2005 02:21:43 UTC