- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:06:36 +1000
- To: "Jim Thatcher" <jim@jimthatcher.com>
- Cc: <sdale@stevendale.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, <SLovejoy@csu.org>
On 29 Mar 2004, at 02:09, Jim Thatcher wrote: > The solution for what Steve suggests should be "headings" markup and > thus > headings navigation. Right > It is a solution for screen reader users today, but as > far as I know there is no keyboard value for headings yet. You can't do it with IE out of the box, but keyboard-friendly browsers like Opera have had headings navigation for almost a decade, and one of the common script-based add-ons to Explorer and Mozilla (lots of people produce these, including Jon Gunderson's group at uiuc, Jim Ley, and more recently NILS) for accessibility is indeed keyboard-based headings navigation. > I worry at the > suggestion of several skip links - it could end up like my favorite > example > of how not to do skip links > (http://www.jimthatcher.com/whatnot2004/CSUN-WN-8.5.htm) where over > half the > words on the page were skip link words. I think this demonstrates precisely why the skip links thing is a bit of a hack designed to get around the fact that most user agents never got the hang of grouping links and passing over them - something that was readily available in HTML in the mid-90s (and was implemented in early browsers like Lynx). I agree with Jim that having a page which grows an extra 15 links which all say "skip this" or something similar isn't a huge net win. Cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundación Sidar charles@sidar.org http://www.sidar.org
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2004 17:09:50 UTC